{"id":5207,"date":"2018-01-29T10:05:02","date_gmt":"2018-01-29T17:05:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/factbasedhistory.com\/?page_id=5207"},"modified":"2024-09-01T17:02:26","modified_gmt":"2024-09-02T00:02:26","slug":"factbasedhistory-descent-of-man","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/factbasedhistory.com\/factbasedhistory-descent-of-man\/","title":{"rendered":"6: The Genus Homo"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
Our\n<\/span><\/b>genus<\/a>, the genus\nof the currently living members of the human race, is \u2018homo.\u2019<\/a>\u00a0 The term \u2018genus\u2019 means a \u2018generic name\u2019 and\nis a general name that is used to refer to a category of beings that all seem\nsimilar.\u00a0 It really has no scientific <\/i>meaning and is used only for\ngeneral classification to help people understand the general category of beings\nreferred to.\u00a0 The term \u2018homo\u2019 is often\nused synonymously with \u2018man' or \u2018human\u2019 but it is a generic term that basically\nmeans \u2018man like\u2019 (or \u2018human like\u2019) beings.<\/p>\n The earliest members of the homo genus that have been\nclassified are the Homo\negasters<\/a>.\u00a0 This term is often\ntranslated as 'the working man.'\u00a0\n(egaster is Latin for \u2018working.\u2019)\u00a0\nThis name was coined because these were found around large numbers of\nassorted tools, making researchers think they were dealing with people who\nliked to work and make things.\u00a0 <\/p>\n Homo\nerectus<\/a> is often translated as \u2018the upright man.\u2019\u00a0 This came from its posture, dramatically different and more\nupright than its pan ancestor.\u00a0 Some\nresearchers think homo erectus and homo egasters are different subspecies of\nthe same species, while others think they are in different species.\u00a0 Some think that they may not even be\ndifferent subspecies, but merely different members of the same species and\nsubspecies that happen to look different.\u00a0\n(We don\u2019t all look the same.)\u00a0 We\ndon\u2019t have any DNA from these beings, so we can\u2019t verify the claims.\u00a0 They aren\u2019t really important for the points\nhere:\u00a0 All that matters is that there\nwere early human-like beings that had this classification.\u00a0 Large numbers of fossils have been found\nboth in Africa and in Asia.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n These people traveled a lot.\u00a0 (I will take the liberty of using the terms \u2018people\u2019 to refer all\nmembers of the genus homo.\u00a0 The main\nreason for this is that I need something to call them in discussions and this seems\nmore appropriate than any other name I could find.)\u00a0 <\/p>\n Homo\nhabilis<\/a> is \u2018the tool using hominid\u2019 or \u2018the tool using man.\u2019\u00a0 Homo\nneanderthalis<\/a> and homo\ndenisova <\/a>are named after the sites where their remains were first\nidentified.<\/p>\n Homo\nsapiens<\/a> means \u2018the intelligent hominid\u2019 or \u2018the intelligent man.\u2019 <\/p>\n Until very recently, this term was used to refer to \u2018our\u2019\nspecies, where \u2018our\u2019 refers to \u2018the people who are now classified as humans and\nthe people with similar levels of intellect who lived in the past six thousand\nyears.\u00a0 Those who believed that history\nwent back more than six thousand years thought that the beings who lived before\nthis period were in some other category, at least in a different species but\npossibly in a different genus.\u00a0 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n A family of religions called the \u2018Abrahamic religions<\/a>\u2019\nis built on a set of books called variously by names like the \u2018Books\nof Moses\u2019 <\/a>and \u2018the\nPentateuch<\/a> and the Torah<\/a>\nhave been and still are important religions in the world, claiming more than 57%\n<\/a>of the world\u2019s people as followers, and include Christianity, Judaism, and\nIslam.\u00a0 All Abrahamic religions teach\nthat nothing existed before a certain date (October 23, 4004. B.C., according\nto James Ussher<\/a>, who\nclaims to have worked it out in detail).\u00a0\n <\/p>\n Not everyone accepts the scientific evidence, even\ntoday.\u00a0 <\/p>\n But most educated people accept at least the premise that he\nuniverse is a lot older than 6,030 years old.\u00a0\nThere still seems to be a lot of resistance to the idea that humans\n(meaning true humans, including homo sapiens) go back more than 6,030\nyears.\u00a0 DNA evidence is showing us,\nhowever, that the species homo sapiens definitely goes back a very, very long\ntime, because human-like beings that were once thought to be different species,\nlike neanderthal and denisovans, clearly had babies with beings that were\nanatomically and genetically indistinguishable from modern humans.\u00a0 This means that all three of these groups,\nthought to be different species, are actually the same species.\u00a0 <\/p>\n Let\u2019s look at the evidence we have that can help us\nunderstand the background of the genus homo (human-like beings).\u00a0 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n The earliest specimen of the genus Homo found to date (as of\n2024) was found in the Ledi-Geraru<\/a> site in the Afar\nRegion<\/a> of Ethiopia<\/a>,\nin the northern part of Africa, in January of 2013.\u00a0 It has not yet been assigned to a species as of this writing.\u00a0 It has been given the designation LD-350<\/a>.\u00a0\u00a0 It has been dated back to somewhere between\n2.75 and 2.8 million years BP (before the present).\u00a0 Several other finds have been made that have been dated to\nbetween 1.85 million and 2.75 million years ago.\u00a0 All finds older <\/i>than 1.85 million years ago were found in\nAfrica.\u00a0 We have no evidence of any\n\u2018human like\u2019 beings living anywhere outside of Africa before 1.85 million BP\n(before the present).\u00a0 <\/p>\n This seems to indicate that the genus homo originated in\nAfrica.\u00a0 It also indicates that the\nmembers of this genus who left Africa did so some time before 1.85 million\nyears ago, but probably not much <\/i>before\nthis, or we would have probably found signs of this.\u00a0 That means that we can date the exit of humans from Africa to about <\/i>1.85 million years ago.\u00a0 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n The main difference noticeable between the Pan genus and the\nHomo genus is brain size.\u00a0 We don\u2019t\nactually have brains of early homos for comparison, because brain tissue\ndecomposes quickly.\u00a0 But we can tell the\nbrains of the members of the homo genus were much larger than the brains of the\nmembers of the Pan genus by measuring the brain cavities in remains.\u00a0 <\/p>\n The brain cavities of the earliest adult homos are about\ntwice the size as the brain cavities of adult pans.\u00a0 The brain cavities of adult modern humans are about three times\nthe size of those of adult pans.\u00a0 <\/p>\n I think it is important to try to get some idea how this\nparticular change happened, because large and complex brains are basically the\ndefining features of humans.\u00a0 <\/p>\n We got these large brains somehow.\u00a0 <\/p>\n In other words, they evolved for some <\/i>reason.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n After we got this higher \u2018processing capability\u2019 we could\nuse it for many different things.\u00a0 We\nnow use it to study things, solve problems, and build fantastic machines and\nequipment.\u00a0 But if we want to understand\nwhy we are what we are now and how we got here, we should at least try to get\nsome idea of the reason that these large and powerful brains were needed.\u00a0 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n There seems to be a very obvious explanation for the massive\nincrease in mental processing ability:\u00a0\nThe pans who lived in a certain very specific area got a new toy.\u00a0 <\/p>\n Actually, it was a tool.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n But it is really fun to play with and most of us play with\nit, in one way or another, nearly every day.\u00a0\n(If you drive a fossil fuel powered car, you are playing with it:\u00a0 the fire is in the cylinders.)\u00a0 It has so many uses that, even after having\nhad it for at least three million years, we still\n<\/i>haven\u2019t figured them all out yet.\u00a0 <\/p>\n Fire is such a complicated tool\/toy that the pans who had\naccess to it couldn\u2019t <\/i>understand it\nand use it effectively with the smaller brains they had when they first found\nit.\u00a0 Over the course of millions years,\ndifferent individuals had different genetic profiles (every one is unique) and\ndifferent mental capabilities.\u00a0 <\/p>\n Some had just a little bit better capability to understand\nand use fire than others.\u00a0 <\/p>\n They could do things the others couldn\u2019t.\u00a0 They could meet the needs of their babies\nwhen others couldn\u2019t.\u00a0 They passed their\nmental advantages down to the next generation and showed them tricks they could\ndo with this new toy that others didn\u2019t know how to do.\u00a0 Those that succeeded had greater chances of\nsurvival than those that didn\u2019t.\u00a0 Over\nlong periods of time, the percentage with genes that encouraged larger brains\nto grow increased and the percentage without these genes declined.\u00a0 <\/p>\n This led to what we may think of a \u2018supercharging\u2019 in the\nevolutionary process.\u00a0 In the area where\nthis new toy\/tool was available, progress was incredibly fast, at least\nrelative to places where fire was not <\/i>available.\u00a0 The growth in intellectual capability was so\nprofound that, within a million or so years, the beings that had the use of\nthis new toy\/tool had changed almost everything about the way they interacted\nwith the world around them.\u00a0 <\/p>\n They weren\u2019t as smart as we are now.\u00a0 But they were far, far smarter than the pans\nthat were their evolutionary ancestors, and so different that reasonable\nanalysts would not consider them to be the same genus.\u00a0 They were a different genus, the\n\u2018homos.\u2019\u00a0 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n Fire is mesmerizing.\u00a0\nI have sat and watched wood fires for hours, staring into the\nflames.\u00a0 It has many uses.\u00a0 I cook with it, heat my house with it and,\nwhen the electricity goes out I have candles I can light to see my way\naround.\u00a0 Gasoline engines use controlled\nfire, setting gas air mixture ablaze in conditions that lead to a rapid burn\ncalled an \u2018explosion,\u2019 which is then repeated over and over to make the wheels\nturn.\u00a0 Jet engines use fire, as do\nrocket engines.\u00a0 Guns ignite a highly\nflammable powder to create an explosion that drives a bullet.\u00a0 Armor piercing uranium bullets explode and\nburn on impact in a way that melts steel and turns it into a liquid.\u00a0 The bullet then cuts through what had been\nseveral inches of solid steel as if it were butter, into the center of the\ntank, where it hits oxygen that causes the liquid metal debris to explode again\nto kill everyone inside the vehicle.\u00a0 <\/p>\n Fire is very complicated.\u00a0\nIt takes different skills and different mental connections to figure out\nthese uses than it takes to find bananas and other food in forests.\u00a0 The animals still needed the brain\ncomponents they used to find food and meet their other needs. But those that\ncould expand their brain and direct its activities so that it could do these\nother things had fantastic advantages over those who couldn\u2019t.\u00a0 <\/p>\n To use fire effectively and safely, you need to be pretty\nintelligent.\u00a0 If you are stupid and you\ntake risks with fire, you will not live very long.\u00a0 If you are smart and use fire well, you have incredible\nadvantages over beings that are otherwise the same as you, but don\u2019t<\/i> use fire.\u00a0 They are primitive beings compared to you. \u00a0<\/p>\n The transitions from \u2018primates that don\u2019t use fire\u2019 to\n\u2018primates that do use fire\u2019 is a critical one in the human experience.\u00a0 I really couldn\u2019t find any scientific\nanalysis, even speculative analysis, that showed how this key event took place\nin the literature.\u00a0 But you understand a\nlittle bit about the geography of Africa, the domains of the pans, and the way\nthat oil pools above fields with great pressure and then catches fire from\nnatural events, you can get a pretty good idea where and how it is likely to\nhave happened.\u00a0 <\/p>\n The descriptions below are speculative.\u00a0 But they are only designed to fill in some\nimportant holes in the way we look at ourselves and our past.\u00a0 These exact\n<\/i>events may not have happened, but something similar did happen.\u00a0 We can understand a process a lot better if\nwe can put a picture of it together in our minds.\u00a0 I want to describe the picture for you: <\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/p>\n First let\u2019s set the scene: <\/p>\n Let\u2019s consider again the picture of Africa taken from\nspace.\u00a0 <\/p>\n <\/p>\n
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 For many centuries, the\nAbrahamic religions controlled state apparatus in large parts of the world and\nrequired all followers to accept this story on pain of death.\u00a0 People couldn\u2019t do research into events that\nthey thought occurred before this date, because that would subject to them to\narrest, execution, and confiscation of all their property by the state.\u00a0
\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 We will go over this period in\nhistory later in the book.\u00a0 The ban on\nanalysis faded away fairly slowly (or so it appears to us who lived through\ntime) as more and more evidence showed it had to be wrong and religious\nauthority faded.\u00a0 But as recently as a\ncentury ago, teachers in the United States could be arrested for implying the\nchronology was wrong under the Butler Act<\/a>, which\nprohibited certain teachings that were inconsistent and many countries today\nstill have laws prohibiting providing children with inconsistent information\nand, while it isn\u2019t strictly illegal, many jurisdictions go to great\nlengths <\/a>to discourage this teaching.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\nThe Genus Homo<\/h2>\n
What Are Homos?<\/h2>\n
Fire<\/h2>\n
Fire <\/h2>\n
Unity<\/h2>\n